Opinion · Nylaw New York

OPGAL, INC. v. BURNS, 9 N.Y.2d 659 (1961)

173 N.E.2d 50

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1961-01-01
Topic: general

OPGAL, INC. v. BURNS, 9 N.Y.2d 659 (1961) 173 N.E.2d 50, 212 N.Y.S.2d 74 OPGAL, INC., et al., Respondents, and PRESS WIRELESS, INC., et al.,Intervening Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. JOHN J. BURNS et al., Constitutingthe Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, Appellants.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 28, 1960 Decided January 19, 1961 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MARIO PITTONI, J. Elmer S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed OPGAL, INC. v. BURNS, 9 N.Y.2d 659 (1961). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

OPGAL, INC.v.BURNS,9 N.Y.2d 659(1961)

173 N.E.2d 50,212 N.Y.S.2d 74

OPGAL, INC., et al., Respondents, and PRESS WIRELESS, INC., et al.,

Intervening Plaintiffs-Respondents,v.JOHN J. BURNS et al., Constituting

the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 28, 1960

Decided January 19, 1961

Page 660

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MARIO PITTONI, J.Page 661

Elmer S. Lane, Town Attorney,for appellants.Robert J. GlasserandAbraham Schlisselfor plaintiffs-respondents.Henry Root Stern, Jr.,for intervening plaintiffs-respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Judges DYE, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE. Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD and FOSTER dissent on the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division.