Opinion · Supreme Court of Missouri
Wade v. Ringo
122 Mo. 322
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Missouri
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri
- Date
- 1894-05-28
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam (Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.) Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed. Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wade v. Ringo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
(Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.)
Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed.
Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.