Opinion · Mississippi Supreme Court

Rand, Johnson & Co. v. Peel

Rand, Johnson & Co. v. Peel, 74 Miss. 305 (Miss. 1896)

Type: Opinion
Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Mississippi
Date: 1896-10-15
Topic: bankruptcy

Whitfield, J., delivered the opinion of the court. The motion to vacate the award should have been sustained. *3072 Am. & Eng. Enc. L. (2d ed.), 646, 647, and authorities cited.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rand, Johnson & Co. v. Peel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion to vacate the award should have been sustained. *307 2 Am. & Eng. Enc. L. (2d ed.), 646, 647, and authorities cited. This being the reference of an action at law, the award falling, the submission falls with it. Id., 813, subd. 19, and note 2. The award in such case is to be dealt with as to procedure here, and have the “ same effect as the final judgment of the court into which the award was returned. ’ ’

The judgment is reversed, the award set aside, cmd cause remanded.