Opinion · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.
79 Misc. 2d 168
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1973-09-21
- Topic
- general
Memorandum. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the lessor failed to satisfy its implied promise to deliver possession of the premises on the date fixed by the lease for the commencement of the term, or within a reasonable time thereafter (cf. Real Property Law, § 223-a; Rein v. Metrik Co., 200 Misc. 231; Hartwig v. 6465 Realty Co., 67 Misc 2d 450 [App.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
Memorandum. Judgment affirmed, without costs.
In our opinion, the lessor failed to satisfy its implied promise to deliver possession of the premises on the date fixed by the lease for the commencement of the term, or within a reasonable time thereafter (cf. Real Property Law, § 223-a; Rein v. Metrik Co., 200 Misc. 231; Hartwig v. 6465 Realty Co., 67 Misc 2d 450 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]). Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to consider whether the doctrine of unconscionability (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302), relied upon by the court below as a basis for plaintiff’s recovery (see Seabrook v. Commuter Housing Co., 72 Misc 2d 6), should be applied.
Concur — Groat, P. J., Rinaldi and Cone, JJ.