Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Hartman

People v. Hartman, 498 Mich. 934 (Mich. 2016)

Type
Opinion
Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Michigan
Date
2016-12-09
Topic
general

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that found the evidence insufficient to convict the defendant of possession of methamphetamine, MCL 333.7403(2)(b)(i), and we reinstate that conviction, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Hartman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that found the evidence insufficient to convict the defendant of possession of methamphetamine, MCL 333.7403(2)(b)(i), and we reinstate that conviction, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.