Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
Gadigian v. City of Taylor
485 Mich. 966
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2009-11-19
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- directing the parties to consider whether Lee v. Macomb Co. Bd. of Comm'rs, 464 Mich. 726, 629 N.W.2d 900 (2001), was correctly decided
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gadigian v. City of Taylor. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
Diane GADIGIAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 138323. COA No. 279540.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 19, 2009.Order
On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the Court of Appeals correctly interpreted MCL 691.1402a(2); and (2) what evidence a plaintiff must present to rebut the inference of reasonable repair.
Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this *690 case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.