Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
Manuel v. Gill
Manuel v. Gill, 477 Mich. 1067 (Mich. 2007)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2007-04-04
- Topic
- general
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131103 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ISKANDAR MANUEL, MAGGIE MANUEL, Robert P.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Manuel v. Gill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
728 N.W.2d 869 (2007)
Iskandar MANUEL, Maggie Manuel, Jimmy Manuel, Joseph Manuel, Imad Manuel, and Adel Manuel, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Docket No. 131103. COA No. 258933.
Iskandar MANUEL, Maggie Manuel, Jimmy Manuel, Joseph Manuel, Imad Manuel, and Adel Manuel, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Timothy J. GILL, County of Clinton, County of Eaton, Rusty Banehoff, County of Ingham, Eaton County Sheriff, Clinton County Sheriff, Kenneth Knowlton, Lansing Chief of Police, City of Lansing, Lansing Police Commission, Jimmy Patrick, and Ingham County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees and
Tri-County Metro Narcotics Squad, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 131103. COA No. 258933.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 4, 2007.On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.