Opinion · Milaw Michigan

MOLLOY v. MOLLOY, 243 Mich. App. 801 (2001)

PETER MOLLOY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v.WENDY MOLLOY, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff/Appellant., 243 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001)

Type: Opinion
Court: Milaw Michigan
Jurisdiction: Milaw
Date: 2000-12-15
Topic: general

MOLLOY v. MOLLOY, 243 Mich. App. 801 (2001) PETER MOLLOY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v.WENDY MOLLOY, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff/Appellant. Docket No. 224179.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted September 14, 2000, at Detroit. Decided December 15, 2000, at 9:05 a.m.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MOLLOY v. MOLLOY, 243 Mich. App. 801 (2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 1 opinion

MOLLOY v. MOLLOY,243 Mich. App. 801(2001)

PETER MOLLOY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v.

WENDY MOLLOY, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff/Appellant.

Docket No. 224179.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Submitted September 14, 2000, at Detroit.

Decided December 15, 2000, at 9:05 a.m. Vacated in part by

order entered January 12, 2001.243 Mich. App. 801.

The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(H) to resolve the conflict between this case andHilliard v.Schmidt,231 Mich. App. 316;586 N.W.2d 263(1998).

The Court finds under MCR 7.215 (H)(5) that the conflict at issure affects the best intersts analysis found on pages 4 t 6 of the opinion released December 15, 2000, and that portion of the opinion is vacated. In addition, that portion of the opinion remanding for hearing on joint legal and physical custody is held in abeyance pending the decision of the conflict panel.

The appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the clerk's certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellant's brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.Page 1