Opinion · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Hill v. Hill

Hill v. Hill, 2 Mass. 150 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1806)

Type
Opinion
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts
Date
1806-10-15
Topic
bankruptcy

Curia. In a libel for a divorce from bed and board only, you nave no occasion to prove a marriage, unless it be denied. The evidence in support of the charge of cruelty was only of abusive and threatening language. Curia. Threats of violence, without an actual assault, are not a legal cause for divorce, (a) The wife’s remedy in such case is by exhibiting articles of the peace against her husband.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hill v. Hill. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Curia.

In a libel for a divorce from bed and board only, you nave no occasion to prove a marriage, unless it be denied.

The evidence in support of the charge of cruelty was only of abusive and threatening language.

Curia. Threats of violence, without an actual assault, are not a legal cause for divorce, (a) The wife’s remedy in such case is by exhibiting articles of the peace against her husband.

The divorce was refused.

Warren vs. Warren, 3 Mass. Rep. 321. — French vs. French, 4 Mass. Rep. 587. — Sed vide, contra, Hulme vs. Hulme, 2 Adams’s Eccl. R. 27. — Oliver vs. Oliver, 1 Hagg. Cons. R. 364. — Kirkman vs. Kirkman, 1 Hagg. Con. R. 409. — Holden vs. Holden, 1 Hagg. Con. R. 458. — Evans vs. Evans, 1 Hagg. Con. R. 35. — Waring vs. Waring, 2 Phil. 132. — Popkin vs. Popkin, 1 Hagg. Eccl. R. 768. — De’Aguillar vs. De’Aguillar, 1 Hagg. Eccl. R. 773. — Westmeath vs. Westmeath, 2 Hagg. Eccl. R. 72, 112, 113. — Barrere vs. Barrere, 4 Johns. Ch. 187. — 2 Kent. Com. 126, 127, 2d ed ; and vide Perkins vs. Perkins, 6 Mass. Rep. 69.