Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Beauford v. Sisters of Mercy, Province of Detroit, Inc.

484 U.S. 913

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-10-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that legal claims could be collaterally estopped even though the trial court’s findings in the equitable action were erroneous and remanded
  • finding that a difference in qualifications between the plaintiff and her male comparator can constitute a “factor other than sex” for the purpose of showing that a particular salary difference is not actionable under the Equal Pay Act
  • “A difference in qualifications between the plaintiff and the ‘job comparator,’ the person or persons to whom the plaintiff chooses to compare her job status, salary, etc. for the purposes of establishing liability on an EPA claim, can constitute a ‘factor other than sex.’ ”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Beauford v. Sisters of Mercy, Province of Detroit, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
39 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.