Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McKenzie v. General Motors Corp.

McKenzie v. Gen. Motors Corp., 464 U.S. 938 (1983)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-10-31
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • court has discretion to deny leave to amend where the proposed amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • leave to amend need not be granted where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • trial court may deny leave to amend where amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • "An adverse effect on a single employee, or even a few employees, is not sufficient to establish disparate impact.”
  • “the trial court may properly deny leave to amend where the amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss”
  • The plaintiffs’ burden with respect to a disparate impact claim is heavier than it is when disparate treatment is alleged
  • disparate impact analysis requires showing that facially neutral employment practice had a significantly discriminatory impact
  • “the nature of the required showing depends on the circumstances of the case”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKenzie v. General Motors Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
215 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.