Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Penn v. Pennsylvania

Penn v. Pa., 456 U.S. 980 (1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1982-05-17
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that child’s statement was admissible under excited utterance exception even though statement was not made immediately after incident and was the product of questioning
  • no unnecessary delay under Futch, supra, where two hours of administrative processing were caused in part by defendant’s misleading police as to his identity

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Penn v. Pennsylvania. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
11 opinions

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.