Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.

Thompson v. Covington Hous. Dev. Corp., 439 U.S. 1116 (1979)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-01-15
Topic
finance

How later courts describe this case

  • discussing factors relevant to determining whether the named plaintiff may appoint new counsel to appeal the approval of a settlement negotiated by former class counsel
  • counseling against redeciding questions "absent the most cogent reasons such as the avoidance of manifest injustice"
  • experience prerequisite for eligibility for apprenticeship program and on-the-job training found .to perpetuate effects of past discrimination; district court ordered to consider whether experience prerequisite should be shortened
  • “To be sure, the assent of named Plaintiffs is not a prerequisite to court approval.”
  • previous panel determination not binding in light of intervening Supreme Court decision
  • acceptors of individual back pay tender do not waive rights to appeal
  • simultaneous negotiations "weigh heavily" against settlement approval
  • backpay and reinstatement available under Title VII

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
220 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.