Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan
409 U.S. 919
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1972-10-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- even though quantitative equality is preserved, members of a racial or ethnic group are protected from invidious minimization of their voting strength
- members of racial and ethnic groups constitutionally protected from purposeful maneuvers to deprive them of political effectiveness
- in municipal redistricting ease court held that although reapportionment litigation affects interests of large class and such actions are usually brought as class actions, the class action device is not essential
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.