Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan

409 U.S. 919

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-10-16
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • even though quantitative equality is preserved, members of a racial or ethnic group are protected from invidious minimization of their voting strength
  • members of racial and ethnic groups constitutionally protected from purposeful maneuvers to deprive them of political effectiveness
  • in municipal redistricting ease court held that although reapportionment litigation affects interests of large class and such actions are usually brought as class actions, the class action device is not essential

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.