Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Probert v. Family Centered Services of Alaska, Inc.
Probert v. Family Centered Servs. of Alaska, Inc., 565 U.S. 1235 (2012)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2012-02-27
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- relying on a Maine administrative guideline for a narrowing construction of “influencing”
- “In ascertaining the meaning of an ambiguous term, [a court] may use canons of construction, legislative history, and the statute’s overall purpose to illuminate Congress’s intent.”
- “Exposure of official misconduct, especially within the police department, is generally of great consequence to the public;” holding that speech on police malfeasance consisting of the use of excessive force is a matter of public concern
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Probert v. Family Centered Services of Alaska, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 19 opinions
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.