Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Solomon v. South Carolina

Solomon v. S.C., 382 U.S. 204 (1966)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1966-01-17
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Solomon v. South Carolina. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

SOLOMONv. SOUTH CAROLINA,382 U.S. 204(1965)

SOLOMONv. SOUTH CAROLINA.

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 588.

Decided December 6, 1965.

245 S.C. 550,141 S.E.2d 818, appeal dismissed.

Ellis Lyonsfor appellant.Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, andE. N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed on the authority ofSherbertv.Verner,374 U.S. 398. And seeMcGowanv.Maryland,366 U.S. 420,561,577(dissenting opinion).

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.Page 205