Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Estate of Wolf

522 U.S. 801

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-10-06
Topic
estate-planning

How later courts describe this case

  • assuming that prisoner was entitled to sue prison officials for damages under RFRA because the statute defines "government” to include government employees
  • vacating the circuit court decision and remanding for further proceedings in light of City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 117 S.Ct. 2157, 138 L.Ed.2d 624 (1997)
  • vacating the circuit court decision and remanding for further proceedings in light of City of Boeme v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 117 S.Ct. 2157, 138 L.Ed.2d 624 (1997)
  • remanding in light of City of Boerne' § holding that the RFRA is unconstitutional as applied to the states
  • referee’s report admissible under 801(d)(2)(B) where state legislature submitted it to the Department of Justice in seeking preclearance under the Voting Rights Act
  • Muslim prisoner’s equal protection claim “could equally well be described as a claim under the free-exercise clause”
  • vacated and remanded "for further consideration in light of Strate "
  • remanding in light of City of Boerne

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Burlington Northern Railroad v. Estate of Wolf. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
27 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and ease remanded for farther consideration in light of Strate v. A-1 Contractors, 520 U. S. 438 (1997).