Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Burlington Northern Railroad v. Estate of Wolf
522 U.S. 801
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-10-06
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- assuming that prisoner was entitled to sue prison officials for damages under RFRA because the statute defines "government” to include government employees
- vacating the circuit court decision and remanding for further proceedings in light of City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 117 S.Ct. 2157, 138 L.Ed.2d 624 (1997)
- vacating the circuit court decision and remanding for further proceedings in light of City of Boeme v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 117 S.Ct. 2157, 138 L.Ed.2d 624 (1997)
- remanding in light of City of Boerne' § holding that the RFRA is unconstitutional as applied to the states
- referee’s report admissible under 801(d)(2)(B) where state legislature submitted it to the Department of Justice in seeking preclearance under the Voting Rights Act
- Muslim prisoner’s equal protection claim “could equally well be described as a claim under the free-exercise clause”
- vacated and remanded "for further consideration in light of Strate "
- remanding in light of City of Boerne
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Burlington Northern Railroad v. Estate of Wolf. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 27 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and ease remanded for farther consideration in light of Strate v. A-1 Contractors, 520 U. S. 438 (1997).