Doe ex rel. Doe v. Board of Education

How later courts describe this case

• holding that “an adverse employment action ... [sufficient to support a x-etaliation claim is] a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment”
• allegations of constant harassment without recall of the exact dates and circumstances could constitute pervasive harassment
• “The realities of the workplace dictate that employees do not always have the option to work in the location they desire. Employees must often go where the employer determines they are needed most .... ”