Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. United States

380 U.S. 373

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-03-29
Topic: litigation

Per Curiam. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

CHICAGOv. UNITED STATES,380 U.S. 373(1965)

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.v. UNITED STATES

ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

MISSOURI.

No. 770.

Decided March 29, 1965.

233 F. Supp. 381, affirmed.

M. L. CassellandDon McDevittfor appellants.Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney GeneralOrrick, Robert B. Hummel, Donald L. Hardison, RobertW. GinnaneandFritz R. Kahnfor the United States et al.Alexander B. Hawesfor Waterways Bulk Transportation Council, Inc.;Nuel D. Belnapfor Federal Barge Lines, Inc., et al.;Charles J. McCarthyfor Tennessee Valley Authority;Donald Macleayfor Arrow Transportation Co.; andJohn C. Lovettfor Farmers Union Grain Terminal Association et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.Page 374