Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States

379 U.S. 951

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-12-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • affirming dismissal of air traffic controller based on pre-employment conduct including homosexual activity and smoking of marijuana
  • Air Force Command's designation of permissible flying areas, although an unreviewable 'discretionary' determination had regulations been complied with, held removed from 2680(a
  • while military authorities may have absolute discretion concerning when and where to fly, officer liable for negligently failing to warn civilian aviation
  • civilian passengers recover, servicemen passengers do not when an Air Force plane negligently hits a commercial airliner
  • suit not barred where air controllers negligently fail to warn airline of hazardous flight training near airplane’s route
  • pro rata will continue to mean "in numerical shares or proportions based on the number of tortfeasors"
  • Air Force Command’s designation of permissible flying areas, although an unreviewable “discretionary” determination had regulations been complied with, held removed from § 2680(a) exception by Command’s failure to make prior study required by regulation
  • federal law governs finality of judgment for res judicata purposes

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
207 opinions

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.