Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Curators, University of Missouri v. Sullivan

Curators, U. (periodical titles) of Mo. v. Sullivan, 506 U.S. 953 (1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-11-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that an exaction of incriminating statements from a member of the public in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966
  • sustaining a § 1983 action against police officers even though the plaintiffs coerced statements were not used at any proceeding
  • sustaining a § 1983 action against police officers even though the plaintiff's coerced statements were not used at any proceeding
  • statutory language implementing Constitutional directive to conduct decennial census is so nondirective that there may be no law to apply to case alleging census bureau inaccuracy
  • “agency decisions are set aside only if they are ‘arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.’ ”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Curators, University of Missouri v. Sullivan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
60 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.