Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Doughty v. Maxwell
Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. 202 (1964)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-02-24
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- giving retroactivity to Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963)
- summarily reversing Ohio court’s denial of ha-beas relief on ground that petitioner had failed to request assistance of counsel
- summarily reversing Ohio court's denial of habeas relief on ground that petitioner had failed to request assistance of counsel
- re Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963)
- indigent’s right to counsel on appeal
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Doughty v. Maxwell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 154 opinions
376 U.S. 202 (1964)
DOUGHTY
No. 422, Misc.
DOUGHTY
v.
MAXWELL, WARDEN.
No. 422, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided February 24, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.Petitioner pro se.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.