Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Cap. Serv., Inc. v. Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd., 346 U.S. 936 (1954)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1954-01-18
- Topic
- commercial
The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is granted limited to the following question: “In view of the fact that exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter was in the National Labor Relations Board (Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U. S. 485), could *937the Federal District Court, on application of the Board, enjoin Petitioners from enforcing an injunction already obtained from the State Court?” Carl M. Gould for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is granted limited to the following question:
“In view of the fact that exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter was in the National Labor Relations Board (Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U. S. 485), couldCarl M. Gould for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come filed a memorandum for respondent.*937 the Federal District Court, on application of the Board, enjoin Petitioners from enforcing an injunction already obtained from the State Court?”