Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tom We Shung v. Brownell

346 U.S. 906

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1953-12-07
Topic: bankruptcy

Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Per Curiam: The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tom We Shung v. Brownell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 24 opinions

Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.

Mr. Justice Black would re *907 verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent. Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.