Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd., 337 U.S. 913 (1949)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1949-05-31
Topic: general

Certiorari granted limited to the question of the construction of § 8 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 [49 Stat. 449, 29 U. S. C. § 158 (3)] in relation to this' *914case. Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Certiorari granted limited to the question of the construction of § 8 (3) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 [49 Stat. 449, 29 U. S. C. § 158 (3)] in relation to this' *914 case.

Philip S. Ehrlich and Bartley C. Crum for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand and Bernard Durum filed a memorandum for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent. Mathew O. Tobriner for the International Chemical Workers Union, A. F. of L., respondent.