Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Federal Power Commission v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

330 U.S. 802

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1947-03-10
Topic
general

Per Curiam: Judgment reversed on the ground that respondent has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 *803U. S. 41; Macauley v. Waterman S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Federal Power Commission v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
27 opinions
Distinguished
1 times
Per Curiam:

Judgment reversed on the ground that respondent has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 *803 U. S. 41; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 327 U. S. 540.

Howard E. Wahrenbrock argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert L. Stern, Lambert McAllister and Louis W. McKernan. A. J. G. Priest argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were P. A. Lasley, Sidman I. Barber and B. H. Dewey, Jr. By special leave of Court, Wyatt Cleveland Holland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Arkansas. With him on the brief were Guy E. Williams, Attorney General, H. Cecil Kilpatrick, and the Attorneys General of the States of Alabama, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming, as amici curiae.