Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. United States
309 U.S. 694
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1940-02-05
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- where the proposition is stated, although the parties were held to have waived any objection and were not permitted to attack the judgment collaterally
- “State law creates legal interests and rights. The federal revenue acts designate what interests or rights, so created, shall be taxed.”
- state law determines the nature of the legal interest the taxpayer had in the property or income sought
- analyzing meaning of “general power of appointment” for federal estate tax purposes; recognizing that “[s]tate law creates legal interests and rights,” while “federal revenue acts designate what interests or rights, so created, shall be taxed”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 64 opinions