Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. United States

309 U.S. 694

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1940-02-05
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • where the proposition is stated, although the parties were held to have waived any objection and were not permitted to attack the judgment collaterally
  • “State law creates legal interests and rights. The federal revenue acts designate what interests or rights, so created, shall be taxed.”
  • state law determines the nature of the legal interest the taxpayer had in the property or income sought
  • analyzing meaning of “general power of appointment” for federal estate tax purposes; recognizing that “[s]tate law creates legal interests and rights,” while “federal revenue acts designate what interests or rights, so created, shall be taxed”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
64 opinions