Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States

282 U.S. 838

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1930-10-13
Topic: general

Petition for writ *839of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied. Messrs. J. Marvin Haynes, Robert H. Montgomery, and Thomas G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Petition for writ *839 of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.

Messrs. J. Marvin Haynes, Robert H. Montgomery, and Thomas G. Haight for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Rugg and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Charles R. Pollard for the United States.