Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford
281 U.S. 695
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1930-03-17
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co. v. Buford. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question; Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co: v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180,183,184; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334.