Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Hughes v. State Board of Medical Examiners
Hughes v. State Bd. of Med. Exam’rs, 278 U.S. 562 (1928)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1928-10-29
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The writs of error are dismised for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hughes v. State Board of Medical Examiners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Per Curiam:
The writs of error are dismised for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.