Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ex parte Brown

271 U.S. 645

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1926-05-10
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

“Mere continuous administration of property under order of court does not constitute an ‘act’ or ‘transaction’ on part of the receiver”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex parte Brown. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

Per Curiam.

Application for leave *646 to file petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Peters of the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts to allow a direct appeal to this court on a question of jurisdiction, the appeal having been applied for before the effective date of the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, denied upon the authority of Smith v. McKay, 161 U. S. 355, 358.

Messrs. C. C. McChord and Conrad W. Crooker for petitioner.