Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tiedemann v. Tiedemann

Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 251 U.S. 536 (1919)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1919-11-17
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, e. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. Homer S. Cummings and Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tiedemann v. Tiedemann. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, e. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. Homer S. Cummings and Mr. Nash Rockwood for plaintiff in error. Mr. Elijah N. Zoline and Mr, Louis J. Vorhaus for defendant in error.