Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
McNerlin v. Denno
McNerlin v. Denno, 378 U.S. 575 (1964)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-06-22
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- giving retroactivity to Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964)
- rule in Jackson v. Denno applied retroactively to a pending case and the case was remanded for reconsideration in light of Jackson
- re Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed McNerlin v. Denno. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 53 opinions
McNERLIN
v.
DENNO, WARDEN.
No. 1117, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.Richard J. Medalie for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.