Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United States

282 U.S. 811

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1931-01-26
Topic: general

Per Curiam: Judgment affirmed.-,.,) (1) Stange v. United States, ante, p. 270; Aiken, Administratrix, v. Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 277; W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Company v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed.-,.,) (1) Stange v. United States, ante, p. 270; Aiken, Administratrix, v. Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 277; W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Company v. Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 283; Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co., ante, p. 295. (2) Graham v. Goodcell, ante, p. 409; Mascot Oil Com *812 pany, Inc., v. United States ante, p. 434.

Mr. Sidney P. Simpson, with whom Messrs. A. C. Rearick and Theodore B. Benson were on the brief, for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Rugg, with whom Solicitor General Thacher and: Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, Lisle A. Smith, Bradley B. Gilman, and Erwin N. Griswold were on the brief, for the United States.