Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Parmelee v. Chi., Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co., 246 U.S. 658 (1918)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1918-04-29
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with *659costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with *659 costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.

Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error. Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.