Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Illinois v. Washington

Ill. v. Wash., 469 U.S. 1022 (1984)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-11-13
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • finding that because defense counsel served part-time as city prosecutor and the city was significantly involved in the arrest, counsel's professional commitments conflicted with counsel's role as appointed defense counsel in overlapping jurisdictions
  • White, J., dissenting, joined by Burger, C.J. and Rehnquist, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari
  • three justices dissenting from denial of certiorari discuss the Illinois split and note that “numerous” federal courts have not limited Cuyler to cases of joint representation
  • three Justices, dissenting from denial of certiorari, note that “numerous federal courts have failed to discern in Cuyler any limitation to cases involving multiple representation of defendants,” and list these cases

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Illinois v. Washington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
28 opinions

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.