Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Sullivan v. Florida

560 U.S. 181

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2010-05-17
Topic: general

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 560 U. S. ____ (2010) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 08–7621 _________________ JOE HARRIS SULLIVAN, PETITIONER v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sullivan v. Florida. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

(Slip Opinion)            Cite as:

560 U. S. ____

 (2010)                              1

                                     Per Curiam

       NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
       preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
       notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash
       ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
       that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                                     _________________

                                     No. 08–7621
                                     _________________


   JOE HARRIS SULLIVAN, PETITIONER v. FLORIDA
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
              OF FLORIDA, FIRST DISTRICT
                                   [May 17, 2010]

  PER CURIAM.
  The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently
granted.
                                        It is so ordered.