Opinion · Indiana Supreme Court

Matlock v. Indiana & Illinois Central Railroad

16 Ind. 176

Type: Opinion
Court: Indiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Date: 1861-05-31
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The judgment in this case is affirmed, with *1775 per cent, damages, and costs, on the authority of the case of The State v. Bailey et al., ante, p. 46. H. 0. Newcomb and John Tarldngton, for the appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matlock v. Indiana & Illinois Central Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, with *177 5 per cent, damages, and costs, on the authority of the case of The State v. Bailey et al., ante, p. 46.

H. 0. Newcomb and John Tarldngton, for the appellant. C. O. Nave and J. Witherow, for the appellee.