Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, in Error v. Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson
50 U.S. (9 How.) 602
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1850-05-20
- Topic
- general
Order. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript, of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire,.of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, in Error v. Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Order.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript, of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire,.of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.