Opinion · Supreme Court of Georgia
Stripling v. Holton
68 Ga. 821
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Georgia
- Jurisdiction
- Georgia
- Date
- 1882-02-15
- Topic
- commercial
Parol evidence is inadmissible to add conditions to a written contract absolute on its face. 40 Ga., 199; 56 Ib., 31; 57 Ib., 350; 60 Ib., 157, 614; Code, §1950, par. 2.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stripling v. Holton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Parol evidence is inadmissible to add conditions to a written contract absolute on its face. 40 Ga., 199; 56 Ib., 31; 57 Ib., 350; 60 Ib., 157, 614; Code, §1950, par. 2.