Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

U.S. v. URIBE, 421 Fed.Appx. 418 (5th Cir. 2011)

United States, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ivan Alfonso VillarrealURIBE, also known as Chino, also known as Juan Montelongo-Garcia,Defendant-Appellant., 421 F. App'x 418 (5th Cir. 2011)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2011-04-08
Topic
general

U.S. v. URIBE, 421 Fed.Appx. 418 (5th Cir. 2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ivan Alfonso VillarrealURIBE, also known as Chino, also known as Juan Montelongo-Garcia,Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-20738 Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 8, 2011. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. URIBE, 421 Fed.Appx. 418 (5th Cir. 2011). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

U.S. v. URIBE,421 Fed.Appx. 418(5th Cir. 2011)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ivan Alfonso Villarreal
URIBE, also known as Chino, also known as Juan Montelongo-Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20738 Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 8, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark J. Ash, Mark Ash Associates, P.C., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Ivan Alfonso Villarreal Uribe, McRae, GA, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:08-cr-00572.
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:fn*
The attorney appointed to represent Ivan Alfonso Villarreal Uribe has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance withAnders v. California,386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493(1967). Villarreal Uribe has filed a response in the form of a brief. In accordance with this Court's order, counsel filed a transcript of the sentencing hearing and furtherAndersbriefing. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.See5th Cir. R. 42.2.
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩
  2. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. ↩