Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
HTC CORP. v. IPCOM GMBH, 417 Fed.Appx. 976 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
HTC Corp. & HTC Am., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. IPCOMGMBH CO., KG, Defendant-Appellant., 417 F. App'x 976 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2011-04-11
- Topic
- general
HTC CORP. v. IPCOM GMBH, 417 Fed.Appx. 976 (Fed. Cir. 2011) HTC CORPORATION and HTC America, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. IPCOMGMBH CO., KG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2011-1004.United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed HTC CORP. v. IPCOM GMBH, 417 Fed.Appx. 976 (Fed. Cir. 2011). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
HTC CORP. v. IPCOM GMBH,417 Fed.Appx. 976(Fed. Cir. 2011)
HTC CORPORATION and HTC America, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. IPCOM
GMBH CO., KG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 2011-1004.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 11, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in 08-CV-1897, Judge Rosemary M. Collyer.
John S. Skilton, Perkins Coie LLP, Madison, WI, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Geoffrey K. Gavin, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Geoffrey K. Gavin, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before RADER, Chief Judge.
ON MOTION
ORDER
IPCom GmbH Co., KG moves for judicial notice of various published patents. The appellees oppose. IPCom replies.
Because the patents were not presented to the district court for its consideration, and thus the appellees did not have the opportunity to respond in the district court, we deny the motion.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩