Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
U.S. v. MOSLEY, 379 Fed.Appx. 347 (5th Cir. 2010)
379 Fed.Appx. 347
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2010-05-20
- Topic
- general
U.S. v. MOSLEY, 379 Fed.Appx. 347 (5th Cir. 2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tony MOSLEY,Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-11002 Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 20, 2010. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Nancy E.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. MOSLEY, 379 Fed.Appx. 347 (5th Cir. 2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
U.S. v. MOSLEY,379 Fed.Appx. 347(5th Cir. 2010)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tony MOSLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-11002 Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 20, 2010.
Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender's Office, Dallas, TX, William Ernest Hermesmeyer, Federal Public Defender's Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Tony Mosley, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender's Office, Dallas, TX, William Ernest Hermesmeyer, Federal Public Defender's Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Tony Mosley, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:09-CR-62-1.
Before KING, STEWART, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tony Mosley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance withAnders v. California,386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493(1967). Mosley has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.See5TH CIR. R. 42.2.