Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

ODOM v. BURLEIGH COUNTY, 369 Fed.Appx. 767 (8th Cir. 2010)

Charles Bradford ODOM, Appellant, v. BURLEIGH COUNTY Det. CENTER,Unknown Head Supervisor; Detective Kenan Kaizer; Detective Paul Olson;Julie Law., Assistant State's Attorney; Glen Valley, Appellees., 369 F. App'x 767 (8th Cir. 2010)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2010-03-31
Topic
general

ODOM v. BURLEIGH COUNTY, 369 Fed.Appx. 767 (8th Cir. 2010) Charles Bradford ODOM, Appellant, v. BURLEIGH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,Unknown Head Supervisor; Detective Kenan Kaizer; Detective Paul Olson;Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney; Glen Valley, Appellees. No. 09-3230.United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.Submitted: March 22, 2010. Filed: March 31, 2010. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ODOM v. BURLEIGH COUNTY, 369 Fed.Appx. 767 (8th Cir. 2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ODOM v. BURLEIGH COUNTY,369 Fed.Appx. 767(8th Cir. 2010)
Charles Bradford ODOM, Appellant, v. BURLEIGH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Unknown Head Supervisor; Detective Kenan Kaizer; Detective Paul Olson;
Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney; Glen Valley, Appellees.
No. 09-3230.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: March 22, 2010.
Filed: March 31, 2010.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
Charles Bradford Odom, Jamestown, ND, pro se.
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
North Dakota inmate Charles Bradford Odom appeals the district court's1preservicePage 768dismissal of his42 U.S.C. § 1983suit. Following de novo review,see Cooper v. Schriro,189 F.3d 781,783(8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915Adismissal is reviewed de novo), we have found no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.See8th Cir. R. 47B.
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩
  2. The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Charles S. Miller, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota. ↩