Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NEWSOME v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, 331 Fed.Appx. 727 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
Brian K. NEWSOME, Petitioner, v. Dep’t OF the TREASURY,Respondent., 331 F. App'x 727 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-03-16
- Topic
- general
NEWSOME v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, 331 Fed.Appx. 727 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Brian K. NEWSOME, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY,Respondent.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed NEWSOME v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, 331 Fed.Appx. 727 (Fed. Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NEWSOME v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,331 Fed.Appx. 727(Fed. Cir. 2009)
Brian K. NEWSOME, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY,
Respondent.
No. 2009-3019.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 16, 2009.
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in AT0752080282-I-1.
Brian K. Newsome, Lithonia, GA, pro se.
ORDER
Petitioner having filed the required brief, it is
ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.
Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.Page 728
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩