Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ERVIN v. U.S., 329 Fed.Appx. 263 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
JADE TRADING, LLC, by & through, Robert W. ERVIN & Laura KavanaughErvin on behalf of Ervin Cap., LLC, Partners Other than the TaxMatters Partner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES,Defendant-Appellee., 329 F. App'x 263 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2009-01-06
- Topic
- general
ERVIN v. U.S., 329 Fed.Appx. 263 (Fed. Cir. 2009) JADE TRADING, LLC, by and through, Robert W. ERVIN and Laura KavanaughErvin on behalf of Ervin Capital, LLC, Partners Other than the TaxMatters Partner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES,Defendant-Appellee.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed ERVIN v. U.S., 329 Fed.Appx. 263 (Fed. Cir. 2009). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
ERVIN v. U.S.,329 Fed.Appx. 263(Fed. Cir. 2009)
JADE TRADING, LLC, by and through, Robert W. ERVIN and Laura Kavanaugh
Ervin on behalf of Ervin Capital, LLC, Partners Other than the Tax
Matters Partner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2008-5045.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
January 6, 2009.
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 03-CV-2164, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.Page 264
ORDER
Appellant having submitted the required brief, and it appearing that the appeal was dismissed in error, it is
ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩