Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
UNITED STATES v. BOYETT, 215 Fed.Appx. 354 (5th Cir. 2007)
215 Fed.Appx. 354
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2007-01-31
- Topic
- general
UNITED STATES v. BOYETT, 215 Fed.Appx. 354 (5th Cir. 2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon Jane BOYETT,Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-40799, Summary Calendar.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 31, 2007. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Michelle S.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed UNITED STATES v. BOYETT, 215 Fed.Appx. 354 (5th Cir. 2007). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
UNITED STATES v. BOYETT,215 Fed.Appx. 354(5th Cir. 2007)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon Jane BOYETT,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-40799, Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 31, 2007.
Michelle S. Englade, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bernard John Shealy, Amy R. Blalock, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Bernard John Shealy, Amy R. Blalock, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, USDC No. 1:04-CR-115-2.
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sharon Jane Boyett has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in accordance withAnders v.California,386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493(1967). Boyett has filed several responses. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Boyett's responses shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Although Boyett argues in one of her responses that her counsel was ineffective for various reasons, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of these claims on direct appeal.See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987).
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. All other outstanding motions are DENIED.See5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. All other outstanding motions are DENIED.See5TH CIR. R. 42.2.