Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. v. COSAND, 362 Fed.Appx. 890 (9th Cir. 2010)
362 Fed.Appx. 890
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2010-01-26
- Topic
- general
U.S. v. COSAND, 362 Fed.Appx. 890 (9th Cir. 2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph COSAND,Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-30102.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Submitted January 11, 2010.[fn*] Filed January 26, 2010. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.][fn*] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P.34(a)(2).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S. v. COSAND, 362 Fed.Appx. 890 (9th Cir. 2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
U.S. v. COSAND,362 Fed.Appx. 890(9th Cir. 2010)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph COSAND,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30102.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted January 11, 2010.fn*
Filed January 26, 2010.
Ryan Archer, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David Merchant, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
David Merchant, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 1:07-CR-00127-JDS.
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUMfn**
Thomas Joseph Cosand appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud, in violation of18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Cosand contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to adequately explain the sentence imposed, and that the district court's failure to analyze the sentencing factors pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 3555(a) resulted in an unreasonable sentence. The record reflects that the district court properly calculated the Guidelines range, was familiar with the parties' arguments, and that under the totality of the circumstances, the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable.See UnitedStates v. Carty,520 F.3d 984,991-93(9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).AFFIRMED.
- [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩
- The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.SeeFed.R.App.P.34(a)(2). ↩
- This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ↩