Opinion · District Court, S.D. New York

MacDonald v. Martinelli

MacDonald v. Martinelli, 120 F. Supp. 383 (District Court, S.D. New York 1950)

Type
Opinion
Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1950-05-23
Topic
general

S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge. This action is brought by seven named individual employees in their individual capacity and for their own individual benefit respectively. It is not brought for and in behalf of other employees similarly situated.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MacDonald v. Martinelli. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
S. H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This action is brought by seven named individual employees in their individual capacity and for their own individual benefit respectively. It is not brought for and in behalf of other employees similarly situated. Under these circumstances, the provisions of § 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), relating to the filing of consents, are inapplicable.

Motions denied.

Settle order on notice.