Opinion · District Court, S.D. New York
Rosenblum v. Dingfelder
Rosenblum v. Dingfelder, 2 F.R.D. 49 (District Court, S.D. New York 1941)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- District Court, S.D. New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1941-07-07
- Topic
- general
KNOX, District Judge. Before plaintiff is required to throw open to the inspection of defendant “all of the books, ledgers, records, accounts sales of the two assignor corporations, and accounts sales, letters, telegrams in his possession, which plaintiff intends to use on the trial” the defendant, in conformity with Federal Rules of Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, should, showing good cause therefor, formally move for this relief. When this shall have been done, the Court will be in better position than at present to pass upon the merits of the application.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rosenblum v. Dingfelder. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Before plaintiff is required to throw open to the inspection of defendant “all of the books, ledgers, records, accounts sales of the two assignor corporations, and accounts sales, letters, telegrams in his possession, which plaintiff intends to use on the trial” the defendant, in conformity with Federal Rules of Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, should, showing good cause therefor, formally move for this relief. When this shall have been done, the Court will be in better position than at present to pass upon the merits of the application.